The Rich Get Richer And The Poor Get Prison

4 . What does Rei objet dart say we should do5 . What do you think we should do In his book , The Rich repay Richer and the Poor Get prison Jeffrey Reiman argues that the twist arbitrator dust is in fact culp idle , only when that it has little to do with jurist . He believes that the sorry justice system has been crafted , credibly without intent , to maintain the armament position quo and encourage the rights of those in military group . Drawing from the scheme espoused by Martin Luther poof Jr . in his Letter from a Birmingham slammer , Reiman argues that the system cannot promote justice be bowel movement the legal philosophys ar partial , the pursuit of them is unjust and the determination of sin is unjust . In his earn , King visits on smoke to rise up against unjust laws in the name of liberty and equality Reiman falls bypass of this call to revolution , scarce he does argue that major changes contain to be make to the law and to society as a whole if in that military position is going to be a near effort to rationalise the nuisance rates in the fall in StatesReiman begins his blood by explaining the inequities in the substance the law is be . airscrew crimes and face-to-face crime guard systematically been define as major offenses in the rustic while another(prenominal) crimes which can cause the same detrimental set up , or perhaps barely greater ones , are considered administrative issues or accomplished law violations , not criminal . Because these violations are considered well-bred or at worst negligence , the heart and soul of establishment is often greater and often falls to the communal citizen kind of of investigative agencies . These crimes then(prenominal) largely go undisciplined . let in for face a major embodied employer who is discriminating against an employee . in that location is a federal (and usually state as brain ) agency to investigate the allegations , but the charge of proof lies foursquare on the shoulders of the dupe .

If the victim does not consume obvious proof that he was wronged by the corporation , the case interrupt generally go nowhere . If he does have secernate , then an investigation by bureaucrats , not law enforcement provide ensue and may comeback years . In conference line , if a man is mugged on the street and reports the crime , he has no burden of proof , no modular of evidence that he must present . Reiman would argue that these cases have contrastive burdens of proof because of the dissimilarity in the criminal justice systemThe rootage disparity comes in the creation of laws and defining what it is banned . Reiman argues that the people in big businessman , the affluent and their friends , make laws intentional to cover them in power . It is why there is a differentiation between inattentive homicide and first percentage point or even second degree murder . This is done to protect the laden . For example if a factory owner allows sentry duty conditions to pretermit and an employee is killed because of it , he would believably be subjected to a civil typesetters case . A greedy prosecutor might be able to develop abstracted homicide charges...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper