Endgame by Samuel Beckett :: essays research papers

As stated by Cohn in her article " Endgame The gospel truth According to Sad Sam Beckett" there is much evidence accustomed relating to the many a(prenominal) comparable instances between the Bible and Becketts Endgame. With this interpretation as tumesce as the discussion about the significance of the title, and the constant reference to the reverse of the world, it is nearly impossible to see Becketts Endgame as anything other than a post-apocalyptic tale. I found particularly interesting Cohns relation to Becketts roleplaym and the Bibles Ham. Ham cosmos the son of Noah, as Cohn states, he is responsible for the survival of life. In the Bible, Ham obeys the wishes of his father, and thus God, and devoted his life to the expansion of humanity and the earths mere existence. As the Noah story tells, God, unhappy with the world, creates a mass flood that kills the entire worlds population, bar a male and a female of every species. This boatload of macrocosms was to a rrest the world anew, to try and commence it a better place. If Hamm is supposed to be a comparison to the scriptural Ham, could it not in any case be considered the Biblical Ham if things had g superstar wrong? Hamm, throughout the story welcomes the apocalypse, curses God and is scornful to his own existence. If the Biblical Ham had been his contemptuous person, could God not sacrifice sent yet another apocalypse to yet again lay off the world and try again? Is Beckett trying to say that it took more than wiz try for God himself to get it right? I find this a much clearer reading then one of each character being part of the brain. The text supports this in many ways, most already support by Cohn. Her evidence, however, lead me to this conclusion. Her description of the resurrections also works with this theory. The world had many resurrections, all in the pursuit of a better place. Basically I find this play an instance of "What if?" What if Ham (Biblical) had screwe d up? What if Gods great plan of the flood did not work? I also find Becketts description of the small boy, the glimmer of hope, to be an image of a savior, possibly Jesus. This savior is another attempt by God to make a perfect world. In relating this theory to that of the term "endgame" one can also determine that possible life, humanity is in a constant game with God, or some higher being.