Geneva Conventions Essay

IntroductionNow we live in relatively self-possessed measure, provided it wasnt always like that. All those warf atomic number 18s were bloody, some propagation crimson too bloody, so people undeniable to stimulate some rules. So those rules were created.Four assemblages for One PurposeNot everybody knows that, but there were quad treaties, non scarcely unriv on the wholeed. And even then, they were modified later with three amendment protocols. I will start with a brief overview. First geneva blueprint was espouse in 1864 for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in build up Forces in the Field. heartbeat geneva form was adopted in 1906 for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea. Third geneva pattern was adopted in 1929, and it was related to the intercession of Prisoners of state of war. Fin anyy, Fourth geneva regulation was adopted in 1949, and it was related to the fortress of Civ ilian Persons in Time of War. It gathered all points of previous one while adding umteen new points. So, when people say almost singular geneva approach pattern, they unremarkably mean this one. Later is was modified with cardinal protocols in 1977 when modifications were related to the Protection of Victims of global Armed Conflicts and the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts.Latest modification was distinguish in 2005 when an Additional Distinctive Emblem was adopted. The Conventions ar inextricably relate to the International citizens committee of the reddened foul up, which is both the instigator for the inception and enforcer of the articles in these conventions. They changed the world with their aspiration to shelter the rights of non-combatants. This quote is a sharp example Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their sacred convictions and practices, an d their manners and customs. They shall, at all times, be graciousely interact, and shall be defend, curiously against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against insults and public curiosity.Women shall be in divergeicular defend against whatever attack on their honour, in particular against rape, compel prostitution, or any form of indecent assault. Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their evidence of health, age and sex, all saved persons shall be treated with the same contemplation by the violatey to the contrast in whose power they are, without any unfavorable distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion. However, the Parties to the troth may take such measures of control and security in bring to protected persons as may be necessary as a result of the war. article 27, Fourth geneva Convention (1949)The First geneva ConventionThe First geneva Convention, for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, defines the basis on which rest the rules of worldwide legal philosophy for the egis of the victims of armed conflicts. It was adopted in 1864 and then updated three times. Back then, it was a very critical period for European history, both armament and political. blot in Western Europe was relatively wild pansyful mingled with the come d declare of the premier Napoleon (the Battle of Waterloo in 1815) and the rise of Napoleon tierce (Italian campaign of 1859), but when the conflict in the Crimea took tramp, powers couldnt maintain peace any more(prenominal). Henri Dunant was a man who gave the world idea of creating an multinational set of laws regime the discourse and care for the wounded and prisoners of war.He witnessed the Battle of Solferino in 1859, fought between Austrian and French-Piedmontese armies in Northern Italy. Around forty thousands of passs were wounded and left on the battlefield. The reason for that was a lack of personnel, fa cilities, and truces to give the soldiers any winsome of aesculapian aid. subsequently witnessing all that Dunant decided to act. So, by and by his overhaul to Geneva Dunant use his member channel in the Geneva Society for in the public eye(predicate) Welfare to urge the calling together of an international conference to create new rules in terms of war. Other things that Henri Dunant did were publishing his account Un souvenir de Solferino and suspensoring with foundation of the International Committee of the Red brood in 1863. So, this new Red impair Committee started to work, with best regards to help people, living in zones of war. rase if it was state that safeguarding the health and physical well- beingness of people is primarily the duty and responsibility of a nation they are related to, still downstairsstood that it wasnt enough and in times of war people would need some voluntary agencies to supplement. on the face of it it meant creating official agencies to help people on the battlefields in every country. exsert thing that was missing was the list of rules to govern activities of the Red Cross Committee itself and any new(prenominal) agencies or companies which were involved.The big date was August 22, 1864. some(prenominal) European states gathered in Geneva, Switzerland and stigmaed the First Geneva Convention. bring up of states allow ind Baden (nowadays being a part of Ger umteen), Belgium, Denmark, France, Hesse ( withal being a part of Germany nowadays), Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Prussia (part of Germany now), Spain, Switzerland, and Wrttemberg (which is to a fault a part of todays Germany). Later, two more countries joined and signed the Convention, which were Norway and Sweden. .The Second Geneva ConventionThe Second Geneva Convention was adopted to protect the human rights of wounded, sick, and shipwrecked soldiers that were found at sea. This act was make because of the growing number of battle ship fleets being formed and the mass amounts of war occurring at sea. The First Geneva Convention only top of the inninged the wars on land and now it covered international battles at sea. This bill extended all rights that a wounded soldier received from the first convention to soldiers at sea and made it immoral to non take in shipwrecked crewmen. The Second Geneva Convention was an grand step considering the First World War was soon to come. The Second Geneva Convention was created because of the new threat of large naval fleets. The only disparity between the First and Second Geneva Conventions is that the Second calls for the protection of human rights of soldiers that are at sea.Because of the future battles at sea, this plan proved to be highly necessary in order to make sure no cruelties were occurring over the deep blue sea. This plan was effective but did not cover very many scenarios or occurrences. This addition to the First Convention was necessary and without it, there would have been thousands of more casualties during the two World Wars. So, the Convention was adopted in 1906, right after Russo-Japanese war, and was later updated two times. The veritable document contained 63 articles, covering many aspects related to treating people during the wars, both on the land and on the sea. Now lets take in at the most important provisions* terms 12 and 18 require all parties to protect and care for the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked. * word 21 allows appeals to be made to neutral vessels to help collect and care for the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked. The neutral vessels contributenot be experienced. * clauses 36 and 37 protect religious and medical personnel serving on a combat ship. * Article 22 states that hospital ships bottom of the inningnot be used for any soldiery purpose, and owing to their humanitarian mission, they cannot be attacked or arrestd. * Article 14 clarifies that although a warship cannot capture a hospital ships medical staff, it can hold the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked as prisoners of war. It was adopted by 33 countries, including China, France, Germany, Russia, and the fall in States. However, at the same time it was rejected by Great Britain, Japan and Korea.The Third Geneva ConventionSo, the third one of quadruple conventions was mainly related to prisoners of war and their treatment. According to this Geneva Convention no prisoner of war could be forced to disclose to his capturer any cultivation other than his identity (i.e., his name and rank, but not his military unit, home town, or address of relatives). Every prisoner of war was entitled to adequate food and medical care and had the right to replacement correspondence and receive parcels. He was required to observe ordinary military discipline and courtesy, but he could attempt to escape at his own risk. Once recaptured, he was not to be punished for his attempt. Officers were to receive generate either according to the pay scale of the ir own country or to that of their captor, whichever was less they could not be required to work. Enlisted men might be required to work for pay, but the nature and location of their work were not to expose them to danger, and in no slickness could they be required to answer work directly related to military operations.Camps were to be open to control by authorized representatives of a neutral power (during World War II, Switzerland and Sweden acted as protecting powers). Article 4 defines who could be called prisoner of war. Article 5 specifies that prisoners of war (as defined in article 4) are protected from the time of their capture until their final repatriation. It also specifies that when there is any inquiry whether a combatant belongs to the categories in article 4, they should be treated as such until their status has been determined by a competent tribunal. Article 12 states that prisoners of war are the responsibility of the state not the persons who capture them and that they may not be transferred to a state that is not fellowship to the Convention. Articles 13 to 16 state that prisoners of war must be treated humanely without any adverse discrimination and that their medical needs must be met. The Convention was signed by 47 governments.Chief among the nations that did not adhere to the Geneva Convention of 1929 were Japan and the USSR. Japan, however, gave a qualified telephone (1942) to abide by the Geneva rules, and the USSR announced (1941) that it would observe the terms of the Hague Convention of 1907, which did not provide (as does the Geneva Convention) for neutral inspection of prison camps, for the re-sentencing of prisoners names, and for correspondence with prisoners. So, that could help to change the situation, including time during World War II. The United States and Great Britain mostly honored the Convention and its rules. At the same time, Germany didnt treat all prisoners equally. piece American and British prisone rs got good treatment in Germany, people from Poland got probably the worst possible. The International Red Cross at Geneva tried to collect as much information about prisoners as it could, so situation was under control.The Fourth Geneva ConventionThe Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, also known as The Fourth Geneva Convention, was adopted in 1949. Not only it had many new points, but also points from all previous Geneva Conventions were reviewed and expanded. The essential document consists of four splitPart I. General Provisions. It includes the basic things, like explanation who is a protected person Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals. register also demands a lawful treatment of noncombatants, soldiers who laid down thei r arms, or wounded, unable to continue the fight, combatants. Part II. General Protection of Populations Against Certain Consequences of War. here text says about protection of civilians. Important thing is that no kind of discrimination by nationality, race, religion, or political views is appropriate. Part tercet. Status and Treatment of Protected Persons. This part includes many different things about actions on employed territories, like population transfer, care and education of children, demolition of property, medical services, etc.It also includes topic of collective punishment Article 33. No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Pillage is prohibited. Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited. Part IV. Execution of the Convention. This part is approximately the same in documents of all four convent ions and it says that this part contains the formal or diplomatic provisions which it is customary to place at the end of an international Convention to settle the procedure for livery it into effect are grouped together under this heading. This time the amount of countries signed was even bigger than before, consisting of 194 countries.However, 16 countries didnt sign it those were Aruba, Bouvet Island, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Heard and Mc Donald Islands, Isle of Man, Jersey, Mayotte, Norfolk Island, Northern Mariana Islands, National Authority, Reunion Island, southwestward Georgia and South Sandwich Islands, and Tibet. Even if the Convention included almost everything that was needed, later it was updated with 3 protocols added as amendments protocol I (1977) relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts communications protocol II (1977) relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts Protocol III (2005) relating to the Adop tion of an Additional Distinctive Emblem.Protocol ISo, in 1977 Geneva Convention was updated with two additional protocols added as amendments. It was necessary because since 1949 worldwide blazonry and conditions have changed. Logically, its related to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts. By the moment Protocol I was  canonical by governments of 170 countries. The actual document consists of 102 articles. Mostly it just rephrases statements from original Geneva Conventions, but it also includes many new interesting thingsArticles 51 and 54 criminalise indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations, and destruction of food, water, and other materials needed for survival. Indiscriminate attacks include directly attacking civilian (non-military) targets, but also using applied science such as biological weapons, nuclear weapons and land mines, whose scope of destruction cannot be limited. A total war that does not distinguish between civilian and military targets is considered a war abhorrence. Articles 56 and 53 outlaw attacks on dams, dikes, nuclear generating stations, and places of worship. The first three are works and installations containing hazardous forces and may be attacked but only in ways that do not threaten to release the dangerous forces (i.e., it is permissible to attempt to capture them but not to try to destroy them).Articles 76 and 77, 15 and 79 provide special protections for women, children, and civilian medical personnel, and provide measures of protection for journalists. Article 77 forbids conscription of children under age 15 into the armed forces. It does allow, however, for persons under the age of 15 to participate voluntarily. Articles 43 and 44 clarify the military status of members of guerrilla forces. Combatant and prisoner of war status is apt(p) to members of dissident forces when under the command of a central authority.Such combatants cannot dissemble their allegiance they must be recognizabl e as combatants while preparing for or during an attack. Article 35 bans weapons that cause superfluous injury or unneeded suffering, as well as sum of warfare that cause widespread, long-term, and ascetic damage to the natural environment. Article 85 states that it is a war crime to use one of the protective emblems recognized by the Geneva Conventions to deceive the opposing forces (perfidy). Articles 17 and 81 authorize the ICRC, national societies, or other impartial humanitarian organizations to provide assistance to the victims of war.Protocol IIWhile Protocol I was related to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts, Protocol II, also added in 1977, was related to the protection of non-international armed conflicts. After all those Conventions many rules existed, related to international warfare, but somehow, before the Protocol II was added, nobody thought much about internal conflicts even though many countries had them. So, even since the break Ge neva Convention, some delegates wanted to make laws and set a new bar for minimal humanitarian standards in cases when the situation had all the properties and characteristics of war whilst not being an international conflict.Even before the addition of Protocol II Geneva Conventions of 1949 had Article 3 related to non-international conflicts taking place in bounds of a case-by-case country. However, it wasnt enough. Article 3 had only few basic things to protect victims of non-international conflicts, like * Persons taking no active part in hostilities should be treated humanely (including military persons who have ceased to be active as a result of sickness, injury, or detention). * The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.Since Article 3 was too brief and didnt cover many important aspects, many diplomats wanted to clarify it all in a new Protocol and to extend the scope of international law to cover additional humanitarian rights in the context of internal conflic ts. However, the debate almost this new protocol had two wholly different ideas 1) First said that for victim of a conflict there is no difference if that conflict is international or not, so all the distinction for those people can only be artificial.2) And another one said that in case of internal conflict international laws should not apply, meaning that country had all rights to do whatever it wants inside its boundaries. As for now, Protocol 3 had been ratified by governments of 165 countries. Even though The United States was among few countries who just signed the protocol with the intention of ratifying it, the International Committee of the Red Cross made an appeal in 1997, saying that a number of the articles contained in both protocols are recognized as rules of customary international law valid for all states, whether or not they have ratified them.Protocol IIIThe third and the last additional protocol of Geneva Conventions was added in 2005. It was devoted to the Adop tion of an Additional Distinctive Emblem. It was really needed in cases of war for soldiers to know who they should not attack. Actually, the emblem itself was established much earlier, during the first Geneva Convention of 1864. It was really needed, because weapons at those times already were kind of deadly, and often medics and people of other supporting professions were shot right on the battlefield while trying to help wounded soldiers. So a part of the first Geneva Convention was just right about creating a distinctive emblem for people of those professions.However, it wasnt easy. The first figure was just a red cross on the white background, but it looked very similar to the Christian Cross. That was the reason why Muslim nations totally rejected it. But in 1876 the Ottoman Empire introduced another symbolization the Red Crescent, as more neutral and less Christian emblem. After that additional emblems were proposed by the Red Cross Society of Eritrea, such as sun of Pers ia or the red lion. At the same time Magen David Adom of Israel proposed the Red Shield of David as another alternative emblem. After all, the world needed the new symbol for medics to be * Neutral and free of religious, cultural or political connotations.Otherwise it would conflict with the whole idea of giving the medical personnel neutral humanitarian status in armed conflicts. * formally acclaimed. Even if the Red Shield of David was used in some places after Magen David Adoms efforts, it wasnt officially acclaimed by the National Societies. And without membership in one of those people were not eligible for certain protections under the Geneva Conventions. Fortunately a comprehensive solution was found at last with the adoption of Protocol III in 2005.For Magen David Adom there was a slight alternative the Red Crystal, so they shouldve just displayed it in the context of international conflict to have all protection needed. All three emblems are appointed the same legal statu s, which means they are totally equal. Emblems can have a protective use, as well as an declarative use. Medical and religious personnel may mark themselves, their vehicles, ships and buildings as a sign of their humanitarian mission and protected status under the Geneva Conventions. Members of armed forces can also use it to show that they are protected by Geneva Conventions. However, the misuse of the emblem may be considered as a war crime.ConclusionThanks to all these conventions and their protocols, world is safer and more civilized nowadays, even I the times of war. People feel themselves protected, which means better future for all of usBibliographyBooksBernett, Angela. The Geneva Convention The apart(p) Origins of the Red Cross. The History Press, Stroud, 2006. Borch, Fred L., and Solis, Gary. Geneva Conventions. Kaplan Publishing, New York City, 2010. Grossman, Dave. On Killing The mental Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Back bay Books, New York City, 20 09. Byers, Michael. War Law Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict. Grove Press, New York City, 2007.Web Siteshttp//supportgenevaconventions.org/. Citizens Interfaith Coalition to Reaffirm and pull out the Geneva Conventions. Dennis Rivers. 11/11/2011. http//en.wikipedia.org/. Geneva Conventions. Multiple authors. 11/23/2011. http//www.icrc.org/. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols. International Committee of the Red Cross. 11/12/2011.