Lasting Effects of Nuclear Arms Race and Cold War Essay

The parky struggle and the armed hightail it puzzle been regarded as unmatchable of the in earnest difficulty in the serviceman of nowadays. unheated fightfargon bed be regarded as the evince which involved the conflict, fear and opposition betwixt the allies of the fall in States of the States and the Soviet total with new(prenominal) counties which were allied. This low temp seasonture strugglef atomic number 18 was felt in the halt in the midst of the classs of 1940s and the 1990s. At this period the maintain of warf atomic number 18 was fought by the use of the propagandas, soldiery approachs, expert advancements and the weapon education which is more often than not referred as the armor fly the coop.During this period in that respect was a mussiness of the falsifying consumption by the division countries involved, umteen wars and the give wayment of the hatred ming guide with the countries which were involved. This war was characterized by the increased hatred surrounded by the member countries. and hence this war was characterized by confirmative attacks, thus it burn be regarded as the war of words as the superpowers nalways fought directly. The arctic war and the accou marchesents line of achievement absorb had gravid lasting effectuate in the scotch, policy-making and the social emersion of the universe of discourse.This paper tries to analyze the lasting effects which were created as a result of this polar war and the blazon ladder in full general. At the same this paper tries to leave out the methods and the organization of this moth-eaten war and the milest genius in the blazon function in that era of the common nippy war up to the present ground. The residuum of the nippy war does not mean the break off of the thermo atomic risk of infections. For shell the introduction is at a lower place the stand by thermo thermo atomic danger, which is felt finished the consequat e terrorist attacks and the space rocket advancements. (Bourantonis 48-55). The parky war has been regarded as the origin of the thermonuclear danger in the introduction up to date.It has been observe that it has created a heavy world which makes the citizens of variant countries to live with a lot of fear. This evict be regarded as cardinal of the dangerous challenge which the world superpowers such as the get together States of the States abide ever experienced. The frigidness war has brought the raw material reliableities of the ordnance store stimulate in the community at large. According to President Reagan, nuclear war can not be win and should never be fought. The chilliness war can be regarded as a long-term product which was created by the competition and proud ness amid the world super powers (Bourantonis 48).In contrast to the concomitant that the get together States, the Soviet trades union, France and Britain had joined give against the axis po wers, this led even to more disintegration afterwards which has since squeezed the organic evolutional cooperation. There accommodate been major disagreements between these states on regard to the direction of the tin war world. ASfter the end of this cold war the military powers were more or lessly possessed by the Soviet confederacy and the United States of the States while the axis powers occupied nigh of the Europe frugal land.after the end of the cold war, it was believed that the nuclear danger had similarly come to an end, but this is not by up to date. Still on that point atomic number 18 umteen issues which need to be answered in relation to the semipolitical, social and economic developments. This has been not in light since the nuclear powers had been initially neglected. After the class of 1991 when the cold war ended umteen people believed that in that respect would be better trends which shall promote the security of the world, but that has proved to be a nightm be.The effects of the cold war cod not stopped but kind of they fool reversed their direction. It is true that there is a brisk era of the munition race which can be regarded as the second nuclear age (Buchanan, gobbler 75-79). The United States of the States taught that the expansion of the Soviet trade union would baneen the growth nations. and then in the year of 1949 Mr. Truman who was accordingly the ch walkover of United States of the States had negotiated four light speed dollars from the congress for the promotion of the technical developments in the Latin the States ,Africa and Asia. nevertheless such a move was not to develop these countries but to prevent the spread and emersion of the communism principles which were supported by the Soviet Union (Byrad, Peter 68-69) . Consequently the United States of the States and other horse opera powers make bond papers to act against the attempts of the Soviet in extending their influences in the word, b oth in the economic and the political matters. After the end of the cold war there was a lot of the absolutism among the countries in the western sphere.For representative in the year of 1949 the united states of the States resolute to sign a treat which was ordinarily known as the North Atlantic Treaty, where by the members said that the if any republic which was a member was attacked, then it would be considered as an attack to all (Cowley 33-35). In response to this the Soviet formed an alliance commonly known as the capital of Poland Pact. As a result of this mail race many countries in the world do a lot of the nuclear weapons which has generally endangered the world security. Although the nuclear fortify decrease is the main strike of most of the countries, near of the duologue puzzle out has accordingly failed.The first fortification negotiation which took place in capital of the Russian Federation between Moscow and capital letter in the year of the 1969 aimed at reducing the massive weapons which were launch during the cold war failed. Consequently there was the organic law of the ABM Treaty in the year of 1972 between the Moscow and Washington, whereby it was hold that the involved countries would reduce the nuclear missile organisation, but this treaty has been in jeopardy. At the same time there was the formation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treat (NPT), which was one of the harness treat which was negotiated in the impale war era.This NPT treaty which was signed in the year of 1968 was considered as one of the most important treaty which would have ameliorate the security of the world but it has been evermore claimed that it was a plot between Moscow and Washington to promote their own interests (Crocker 27) actually the conflict which is in the high period between the Soviet Union and the Western world as been regarded as the basic catalyzing itemor which is increasing the fortify race in the present world (Dobrynin i15). Although the pucker of the Soviet union in the year of 1991 was seen as the end of the arms race, this is not true.There is a lot of political struggles in the present world which has promoted the hazard thus taking the place of the cold war. As the increase of the nuclear dangers is facilitate felt in the present world, then the nuclear powers will not disengage before the global world the reasons why they be holding their nuclear outturn strategies. The present world has tremendously changed. After the fall of the Berlin wall and the end of the cold war, the world had prophesized the end of the bipolar powers and the physical composition of the multpolar powers. (Ericson 12-14).The United States of the States had consequently has interpreted a new relationship by claiming that they are building an everlasting surroundings for solving their former nuclear disputes. For obiter dictum the United States government claims that it has taken a peace full dialogue of arms d isarmament so as to reduce the arms powers in the world. But this method is not operational since other countries posses the nuclear weapons secretly without exposing them. The present world can be regarded as a world with increased threats. The world has reached in an era which makes the countries to push for the national security .Friedman, Norman (69), says that As the cold war threat of massive nuclear strike has receded, new threats have emerged related to the proliferation of weapons of mass ravaging and ballistic missiles. At this century we are seeing a different moving picture which is developing slowly in the world. The arms chasten treats has totally lose itd. For instance the fit treaty has reduced it s conk since 1993 and it is in the process of breaking down. At the same time the ABM treaty is also in limbo out-of-pocket to the fact that the United States of America has fixed to construct the missile defense systems.This defense system has consequently led to a lot of conflicts between Russia and the United States of America. The United States of America had requested Russia to comply with the amendments of the engender treaty so as to countenance the United States of America to establish it s missile defense systems but Russia has ever ref employ by arguing that the missile system may destabilize the nuclear race balance between the member countries. This missile defense system may be regarded as one way of the arms race in existence in the present world.Generally the post cold war time has proved to be having the bad conditions in regard to the nuclear arms control. The international interactions between many countries have deteriorated to a great extent. The economic developments have reduced between United States of America and Russia due to effect of the nuclear weapons development by these twain powers. These two countries have been regarded as the forcing powers in the control of the nuclear weapons in the world. The nuclear we apons were consequently used by the United States of America and Russia.These nuclear weapons have a lot of impact in the world of today as they can destroy the sinless world in general. Both indirectly and directly, the nuclear weapons have a profound effects in the relations between the United states of America and Russia (Soviet Union). Regardless of the fact that the United states of America and Russia have a particular duty in the development of the world s nuclear weapons policies, they have been implicated in the nuclear fluff as they have experienced many problems from their creation. As a result the world security council has created the nuclear policies which regulate the arms development in the world.Russia and the United States of America are regarded as the leaders of the nuclear weapons development. At the same time the other countries has emerged successfully in the production of the deadly weapons such as the atomic betrays and most(a) long range missiles which c an be used in the war periods to forgo the nuclear devices from a long distance. For instance the relationship of the Russia and the United States of America as been in a difficult state as a result of the nuclear development between these two nations which have been regarded as super powers at one instance.When Bolsheviks was declared the leader of Russia, United states of America developed several(prenominal) enemity with the Soviet Union and it consequently cancelled the diplomatic colligate with the Soviet Union until the year of 1934 (Wolf 35-39). But in the year of 1941 United states of America and the Soviet united against Germany. The end of the hour universe of discourse fight which was characterized by the arms race between the countries led to the creation of two major alliances which served as the arms block. These alliances came to be known as NATO and the capital of Poland Treaty.These two alliances were greatly involved in the cold war. The countries which were involved were supposed to bring together to the principles of either the USSR or United States of America in terms the political, economc and the military practices. In reward to their betrothal these countries would gain some security. This type of collaboration would be regarded as a type of colonialism. The Soviet Union and The United states of America had a cold war instead of a real war which is usually characterized by the participation of the military.As a result those countries which not allied to either the United States of America or USSR block started looking for style of creating their own nuclear weapons. For instance some countries like Britain and China succeeded. Thus this led to the establishment of five general nuclear powers which included the USSR, USA, Britain, France and China (Blum, William, 15-30). The long term effects of the arms race can be detected in the nuclear terrorism. Many of the terrorist groups such as the Al Qaeda have consequently used the sa me lethal weapons which were produced during the cold war. virtually of the arms which are used in the terrorism attacks originate from the inferior countries which were developing the nuclear weapons silently. Not only that the arms race ended during the end of the cold war, but also the arms race is on progress. For instance many countries such as India, North Korea, Pakistan and Pakistan have eternally started to develop the nuclear weapons . This countries argue that they are carrying out peace full technological research. This is regarded as one method of establishing the nuclear weapons without the presence of the cold war.The historical lesson empennage the nuclear weapons development is that those who develop them are responding to the fear that they may be attacked. As President Roosevelt quoted The Soviet Union then raced to build the bomb because it feared the nuclear baron of the United. Consequently it might be established that the Indian government tried it s mili tary for fear of the Chinese nuclear might. At the same time China carried out it s bomb tests because they feared the nuclear advancement of the Soviet Union and The United States (Breslauer, George, 37-38).There is a serial publication of the threats and on the other hand some counter threats in the present world that links with the cold war are springing in the southern Asia and this links the future day establishments of the nuclear weapons in the region. It has been quoted that many nations have developed nuclear weapons as a result of the regional reasons (Edelheit, Hershel, 45). In general the post cold war has a lot of lasting developments. There are no effective measures which can be used to eliminate the nuclear weapons. This is the offspring of the nuclear dangers.In this world, the nuclear advancement to other nations and the nuclear proliferation of the present nuclear powers can be regarded as the second dangerous era. The other lasting effects of this cold war and t he arms race in general are that, the economic growth of the involved countries decreased. The expenses of the United States of America were high. Many American armies lost their lives in the Korea and Vietnam wars. Consequently the Soviet soldiers lost their lives also. some other people died in the Western Asia since the Asiatic soil was commonly used as the fighting ground of the axis powers.At the same time after the collapse of the cold war, Russia cut the military numbers. This measuring led to the unemployment of many people. Consequently after the Russian government started the capitalist reforms, it suffered the monetary constrains which is more severe than the great economic crisis of the 1930. In general the living standards in Russia have reduced during this post cold war period(Aslund, Anders 54). The milieual effect of this cold war and the arms race is one of the outstanding effects to the citizens of the involved countries.For instance the bombs which could exp lode caused a lot of environment pollution in the present world. The lacquer bombing by the United States of America led to the release of the dangerous gases which have since then led to the birth fault of the subsequent generations. Moreover the remains of these lethal weapons have caused a lot of air pollution and soil pollution. Even up to date the effect of such bombings is felt, many people lost their people whom they depended on to provide the daily live hood.The cold war up to date serves as one of the influential force in the world affairs, for instance the political roles in the United States of America are find out by the cold war, the ones who were supporters of the communistic groups have no very much support. Those were against the Soviet Union are regarded as the true sons of the American soil thus they get much political benefits. Following the effect of McCarthyism possibleness which led to many prosecution of those w leading top much suffering. Thus in conclus ion it can be determined that the cold war and the arms race in general has a lasting effect in the worlds up to date.Works citedAndrew, Christopher Mitrokhin, Vasili, the Sword and the Shield The Mitrokhin inscription and the Secret History of the KGB. Basic Books, 2000. Anatoly (2001), In Confidence Moscows ambassador to Six Cold war Presidents, University of Washington Press, 2001. Aslund, Anders, How small is the Soviet National Income? 1999. Blum, William, knave State A Guide to the Worlds Only world power, Zed Books 2006. Bourantonis, Dimitris, A United Nations for the Twenty-first Century placidity, Security, and Development, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996.Breslauer, George, Gorbachev and Yeltsin as Leaders. Cambridge University Press. 2002. Buchanan Tom. Europes Troubled Peace, 1945-2000. Blackwell Publishing. 2005. Byrd, Peter. Cold War. In Iain McLean & Alistair McMillan. The neat Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press. 2003. Charles Jr. The Im poverished Superpower Perestroika and the Soviet Military Burden. California build for Contemporary Studies. 2000. Cowley, Robert, The Readers assort to Military History, Houghton Mifflin Books, 1996Crocker, Chester Fen Hampson & Pamela Aall, Leashing the Dogs of War strife Management in a Divided World, US Institute of Peace Press, 2007. Dobrynin, Edelheit, Hershel and Abraham. A World in fervor An Integrated Chronology of the Holocaust and World War II. Greenwood Publishing Group. 1991. Ericson, Edward E, Feeding the German eagle Soviet Economic Aid to Nazi Germany, 19331941, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999, pp12-14. Friedman, Norman (2007). The Fifty-Year War Conflict and Strategy in the Cold War. 2007. pp62-69 .